Archive for the ‘Conversation Continues’ Category

Reading, Writing…Weight Control?

Conversation Continues
Tuesday, May 15th, 2012

Conversation Continues feature ongoing discussions or news on current health topics with links to related materials.  They are part of the Center for Advancing Health’s portfolio of free, evidence-based coverage of what it takes to find good care and make the most of it.  By Kelly Malcom, Editor, CFAH’s Health Behavior News Service.

A recent report by the Institute of Medicine has called on the nation’s schools to play a key role in stemming the steady increase in childhood obesity by requiring physical education and including food literacy along with other staple subjects such as reading and math. In a Wall Street Journal article, Dan Glickman, chairman of the panel that wrote the report, said, “If you believe this is a massive national problem, you have to deal with it in a systems way.” Yet, the article continues, the challenge is in making the changes.

Schools in Massachusetts are going so far as to ban bake sales and limit access to junk foods during the school day. While it may seem like a lot for schools to take on, many health policy experts see schools—where kids spend much of their day—as a prime target for the fight against obesity.

Earlier this year, the Obama administration unveiled changes to the federally-funded National School Lunch Program to upgrade nutritional standards and ensure that kids receive more fruits and vegetables while at school.  California has already begun to address the way kids eat at school by banning soda and offering low calorie foods.  The changes seem to be working. New research shows that, compared to teens in 14 other states, California students consumed on average 158 fewer calories per day.

New research also suggests that gym class and recess are a benefit to kids mentally as well as physically, by encouraging cooperation and conflict resolution. Esther Entin, M.D., a pediatrician and clinical associate professor of Family Medicine at Brown University’s Warren Alpert School of Medicine, reports on research in The Atlantic that “suggests that recess time can be considered a potentially influential part of the school day that can foster important skills in individual students and in school communities.” Despite this, continues Entin, academic, budgetary and overcrowding issues have conspired to reduce recess.

Case in point: A recent study in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine reveals that in California, where there is a mandate requiring 200 minutes of school physical education every ten days, kids in districts that offered phys ed performed better on fitness tests.  Surprisingly, only half of the CA school districts studied fulfilled the state mandate for PE.

Related Links:

Employee Wellness Programs: The Carrot or the Stick?

Conversation Continues
Monday, April 23rd, 2012

Conversation Continues feature ongoing discussions or news on current health topics with links to related materials.  They are part of the Center for Advancing Health’s portfolio of free, evidence-based coverage of what it takes to find good care and make the most of it.  By Kelly Malcom, Editor, CFAH’s Health Behavior News Service.

Employee wellness programs sound like a good idea. After all, it’s in a company’s best interest to have a healthy, productive workforce and to try to keep the cost of group insurance down.  Before any benefits of such programs can be realized, however, companies need buy-in from their employees.

A recent HBNS news story reported that creating teams with potential lottery-style cash rewards motivated more employees to complete health risk assessments, a core feature of many wellness programs.   “There is often this assumption if we just give people ‘x’ amount of dollars, the bigger ‘x’ is, the more effective it will be.  One can argue that lotteries take advantage of the fact that people don’t understand probabilities very well,” said Kevin Volpp, MD, co-author of the study.

Some employers use incentives tied directly to health insurance, as Washington Post’s Sarah Kliff writes: “Some wellness programs use carrots, decreasing a worker’s health insurance premiums if they enroll in a smoking cessation program or start hitting the gym. Some use sticks, setting higher deductibles or premiums for those who can’t meet a certain body-mass index or do not quit smoking.”  Other employers forgo the carrot and the stick altogether by making wellness programs compulsory.

Kevin Volpp, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, who has studied the use of incentives in health insurance programs, says, “We’re seeing a big move in this direction driven by employers’ concern about rising health costs and their sense that employee behavior has a lot to do with high cost.”  A recent USA Today/Kaiser Health News story details one such company, which subjects its employees to an annual health check to determine how much they will pay in insurance premiums.

However, Julie Appleby reports that some approaches raise the disturbing possibility of discrimination based on health status: “While supporting wellness programs in general, several patient advocacy groups warned the Obama administration last March that additional consumer protections are needed. Tying medical test results to financial incentives or penalties in premiums or deductibles could discriminate against some workers, especially those who already have health problems…”

Whether these programs can really curb health insurance costs is still up for debate, but there is growing evidence to support them.  According to a recent study in the American Journal of Health Promotion, employees who participated in a health-improvement program had fewer medical costs over three years than those who did not.

Related Links:

Diabetes: “Valuable Truths about Food and Consequences”

Conversation Continues
Monday, February 13th, 2012

Conversation Continues feature ongoing discussions or news on current health topics with links to related materials.  They are part of the Center for Advancing Health’s portfolio of free, evidence-based coverage of what it takes to find good care and make the most of it.  By Kelly Malcom, Editor, CFAH’s Health Behavior News Service.

 

Recently, celebrity chef Paula Deen, famous for her high-fat and high-sugar versions of Southern-style cooking, announced that she has diabetes and will be a spokesperson for the diabetes drug Victoza.  Her announcement drew fire from those who felt it was opportunistic; that she ignored or glossed-over the fact that the very foods she championed on her cooking show were the type people who are at risk of diabetes should avoid.  Frank Bruni, former NYTimes food critic, (quoted in title) pointed out that Deen isn’t the only celebrity chef “exhorting people to pig out” (though when not in front of a camera many admit to being cautious eaters).

While some thought that the criticism lobbed Deen’s way was unfair, her announcement did get people discussing the increasing rates of diabetes.  In her article, Why Is Type 1 Diabetes Rising Worldwide?, journalist Maryn McKenna explores a diabetes conundrum.  Type 2 diabetes is linked to obesity, so it makes logical sense with rising obesity comes an increase in type 2 diabetes (also known as adult-onset diabetes).  But what about Type 1?  McKenna points out that researchers are unsure about why type 1, an autoimmune disorder typically diagnosed in children, is similarly on the rise.

This means many more people will have to learn how to manage their blood sugar, a complex task that for many involves daily injections of insulin and glucose monitoring.  Completing these tasks and maintaining appropriate blood glucose levels can be especially challenging for children with type 1 diabetes, as Michelle Katz and Lori Laffel point out in their piece, It Takes A Village: Caring for Children with Diabetes.  “Families need frequent support and extensive education in diabetes self-management in order to have the knowledge and skills necessary to successfully manage the condition…technologies offer only a form of imperfect insulin replacement, as remarkable rigor is required to orchestrate the changing treatment demands of fluctuating glucose levels in an active, growing child.”

Alleviating the toll of diabetes, which can include higher risks for kidney disease, blindness, stroke and amputation, begins with timely diagnosis and help.  The National Institutes of Health recently released a fact sheet detailing how a common test for blood glucose levels, called the A1C test, can be used to diagnose type 2 diabetes and prediabetes.  Online resources and chats with people who have diabetes can be helpful for some: Amy Tenderich of DiabetesMine and TuDiabetes are two highly respected sites.  In addition, recent HBNS stories covering diabetes research studies can be found here.

 

Related Links:

The Persistence of Medical Error

Conversation Continues
Tuesday, January 17th, 2012

Conversation Continues feature ongoing discussions or news on current health topics with links to related materials.  They are part of the Center for Advancing Health’s portfolio of free, evidence-based coverage of what it takes to find good care and make the most of it.  By Kelly Malcom, Editor, CFAH’s Health Behavior News Service.

 

The hospital can be a frightening place, not only because of the injury or illness that bring you there, but also because of common medical errors that can complicate your treatment and recovery.  While a 1999 Institute of Medicine report opened policy makers’ and the public’s eyes to the widespread, often life-threatening mistakes made by care providers during the course of treatment, many hospitals still struggle to prevent errors.  Why?

For starters, a recent article in the New York Times suggests that some doctors and nurses aren’t sure what qualifies as an “adverse event.”  Medication errors, bedsores, infections, excessive bleeding?  Thus, only 1 out of 7 such events suffered by Medicare patients are reported.  Daniel Levinson, inspector general of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, says that employees either assumed someone else would report the episode, or they thought it was so common that it did not need to be reported, or they “suspected that the events were isolated incidents unlikely to recur.”  What’s more, when employees did report errors, “hospitals made few changes to policies or practices.”  In many cases, hospital executives told federal investigators that the events did not reveal any “systemic quality problems.”

Systemic or not, medical mistakes happen for a variety of reasons, including simple distraction. For example, the same cell phones that distract many drivers are distracting physicians and nurses at patients’ bedsides, even during surgery.  Could a text message about an upcoming party really have caused this doctor to fail to send an order to stop a medication?  The challenge, Anne Polta says, is for care providers to balance the potential patient-safety benefits of mobile technology with the desire and tendency to use them for non-clinical purposes.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, hospital leaders and other government officials are working to address some of the more common medical errors, including a goal to decrease preventable hospital-acquired conditions by 40 percent by the end of 2013.  A good example of these efforts can be found at Hennepin County Medical Center in Minnesota.  Over the course of nine months, this hospital cut their rate of medication errors from an outrageous 92 percent to nearly zero.

Part of the solution is to enlist the help of patients themselves. Outlined in the Prepared Patient feature article Reducing Your Risk of Medical Errors and echoed in a recent post by blogger and physician Howard Luks, MD, there are simple steps patients can take to reduce their risk of becoming a statistic, including asking for their medical records, writing down questions and seeking second opinions.  As these examples show, a little bit of awareness can go a long way.

Related Links: