Archive for April, 2011

Turning 65: The Sellers Were After Me

Trudy Lieberman
Thursday, April 28th, 2011

This is the second in a series of posts that examine the process of signing up for Medicare, navigating its rules, choosing supplemental coverage and planning for health care in a program with a very uncertain future. Read the first post Turning 65: It Was Time for Medicare.

Even before I officially signed up for Medicare, sellers of Medicare Advantage plans, prescription drug benefits and Medigap policies began stuffing my mailbox with marketing brochures and lead cards—the kind that ask for your name and address and tell you that a salesperson will call if you return the card.  Since the first of the year, I have received five lead cards asking for personal information, four solicitations for Medicare Advantage plans, two for stand-alone drug plans and three for Medigap insurance.

Like the good shoppers we are supposed to be, I sat down and sifted through the sales brochures. Most did not contain the outrageously misleading and deceptive claims insurers once used to sell policies to seniors.   Much of the information was of the CYA variety—a lot of legal boilerplate.  Some of it was irrelevant; some was simply confusing or incomplete.

Lead cards, on the other hand, were more questionable.  Historically, sellers have used lead cards to reel in customers through all kinds of deceptive tactics.  Sellers of Medigap policies can still show up unannounced at a senior’s doorstep. But in recent years, the federal government has clamped down on sellers of Medicare Advantage plans.  Consumers must agree in writing before an agent can visit them in their homes or call on the phone. The cards (some are letters) have coupons for consumers to sign and return giving that permission.  State Farm’s solicitation advised that I would be agreeing to let an agent contact me in the next two weeks.   Perhaps they were in a hurry for a sale.

Another card was the kind that Medicare counselors warn against because they use scary language to frighten consumers.  Called the “Medicare Open Enrollment Inquiry Card,” it warned me: “You only have ONE open enrollment period”—to make people respond pronto.   The card asked for my date of birth and phone number—and my spouse’s—and whether I wanted information about prescription discounts. This card looked almost identical to one the Federal Trade Commission investigated 23 years ago.  My card was to be returned to the SD Reply Center in Rockwall, Texas.  Someone or some company was prospecting for business.  I once interviewed officials at a company in Texas that preyed on seniors by sending out similar scary lead cards.  I wasn’t about to send my personal information down there.

A similar lead card arrived saying “IMPORTANT MEDICARE HEALTH CARE INFORMATION ENCLOSED” and then it exhorted me in big letters to “OPEN IMMEDIATELY−DO NOT DELAY.”  The card included a check-off box to accept an offer that seemed both appealing and harmless: “Please see that I receive information on the Medicare health care options available to me.”  This card was to be sent to the National Reply Center in Indianapolis.  I recalled that address too from my days at Consumer Reports reporting on similar misleading promotions.  So I wouldn’t send personal information there either.

Two letters from SafePath Benefits, a licensed insurance sales agency in New York, promised a free consultation about Medicare options as a come-on to entice people to call their toll-free number.   “We’ll work with you until you’re 100% confident that you’ve made the right decision,” one letter read.  Would that decision aim toward a SafePath product?  Although the small print at the bottom of the letters disclosed the firm was selling insurance, SafePath referred to its sales agents as “specialists” and “benefits advisors.”  Would a senior understand they were really selling insurance, especially since the pitch was carefully crafted to make people think these “advisors” were friendly counselors who would lead them to the right choice?

An 11-page booklet from UnitedHealthcare using AARP’s name was borderline deceptive.  A big red banner across the front said “Medicare Advisor.”  Below it were the words “Your Guide to Understanding Medicare,” and below that was a table of contents.  The booklet was exactly the same size as the government’s “Medicare & You” handbook sent to beneficiaries each year, and the typeface was the same, too.  At first I thought the AARP/United brochure was the official Medicare handbook.  If I, as an expert, was confused, what about those less knowledgeable?   That may be what the seller had in mind.

On the inside page was a greeting from a UnitedHealthcare vice president and a phone number to call for more details about United’s offerings in New York.  At the very bottom at the back of the brochure in small print was the message:  “This is an advertisement.”  No kidding!  But what were they advertising?  Much of the information inside was generic—basics about Medicare.   The brochure was a subtle sales pitch for Medicare Advantage plans.  Medigap plans were barely mentioned.  A shopper would have to make a phone call or two to get the full story on the options for covering all the gaps.

UnitedHealthcare, the nation’s largest insurance company, has cornered the market using AARP’s brand. Judging from my own sample of solicitations, they are also the most aggressive, at least in New York. 

I began my search for ways that I could  close Medicare’s coverage gaps by dissecting the United/AARP offerings for Medigap policies, the option most people on Medicare still choose, and along with it a stand-alone drug plan that I would need.  I called Bonnie Burns, a Medicare expert with California Health Advocates, seeking advice.  She is a one-of-a-kind objective and thoughtful resource on Medicare and has helped me a lot over the years.  Seniors new to Medicare usually don’t have someone like that to turn to.  She chuckled and said, “I think you’ve gotten off easy with the number of mailings that you got.  It could be worse and probably will be before your birthday.”

Guest Blog: Health Information Technology Has Come to My Town

Linda Bergthold
Thursday, April 28th, 2011

Linda Bergthold is a health policy consultant and a blogger for the Huffington Post. She has over twenty-five years of experience in health care and was a working group leader in Hillary Clinton’s Health Care Reform Task Force in 1993. She has been an advocate of health care reform for two decades in California and nationally.

All the talk about information technology in health care was just an abstraction to me until it actually came to my town.   I read about all the money the federal government was spending to spur the development of electronic medical records, but most of my records were still stored in those vast walls of color coded folders. Then my medical group introduced a new IT system that allows patients to do a lot of fantastic things online – for FREE!

I used to hate calling for an appointment, because you had to deal with the phone menu options then wait for someone to answer, who would usually put you on hold. To me, the most important person in a medical office is that person at the front desk, but you wouldn’t know it by what they are paid (not very much) or trained (not very much).  The innovation of being able to go online and ask for an appointment directly was one I knew I would like.

I had heard about emailing your doctor, but initially it cost $60 a year, and I just didn’t think I would use it that much.  After a few months, though, the medical group made all online services free, including emails.

The first time I emailed my doctor I was careful to make the message short and to the point.  I was worried that I would “bother” the doctor with my questions.  I thought I probably had a urinary tract infection (UTI) and I told her my symptoms. To my surprise, I received an answer a few hours later with an electronic order to have a urine test.  When I arrived at the lab, they had my information and I waited about five minutes.  By the time I got home several hours later, the results of my test were online, including an email from my doctor that I did indeed have a UTI and she had ordered a prescription that was already at my pharmacy.

By now I was really getting into this online stuff.  I started making appointments online, asking for prescription refills online, checking out my test results and getting information about what the results meant.  All the little annoyances and barriers that keep you from taking care of business regarding your health were being removed, and fast! I had been dragging my feet on my annual mammogram, but after an email consult with my doctor (Do I really have to have one this year? What is the evidence that I need one?), I made my appointment.

When I go see my doctor, she sits on a stool with a portable computer in front of her, where she can see all my records at a glance.  As I tell her my problems, she enters them in my record, and by the time I leave, I have a printout of any instructions or medications I need to follow.

This is the way medical care should work.  The systems support you, the patient, not just the physicians and the administrators.  When you are not feeling well, you get fast results and pretty immediate attention.  True, you need a computer or access to one, but you can do the same stuff on a smart phone too.  Privacy problems? Not as far as I can tell.  I have my own log-in and password. Could some of my medical information be shared inappropriately? Maybe.  But because I am on Medicare, I can’t have my insurance taken away from me because some insurer finds out I have a pre-existing condition, so I basically don’t care.

I have no idea how many U.S. medical practices provide this type of service to their patients.  If I were you, though, I would certainly ask::  When will I have access to my medical records online? When can I email my doctor? When will this come to my town?

Pothole Forming Ahead: Aging and the Migration of Health Services and Information Online

Jessie Gruman
Wednesday, April 27th, 2011

Jessie GrumanIt was only a small hole in the pavement in front of my building last fall.  But the seasonal snow, ice and salt, a dramatic increase in traffic and the neglect of a cash-strapped local bureaucracy has produced a honking big pothole that slows a lot of people down.

We face a similar figurative pothole as vital health-related activities such as appointment scheduling, interaction with providers and comparative cost and quality information migrate to the Web.  This change threatens to leave behind older people who are more likely to have health conditions for which informed decision making and frequent communication with providers are critically important because they – even those who are Web-savvy – are more likely to experience changes in vision, hearing, cognitive abilities and fine motor skills that inhibit their ability to successfully navigate and use online services.

Jessie Gruman - Pothole Forming Ahead...

Much research has described those age-related limitations and many authoritative bodies have translated that research into practical recommendations about the online functionality and content organization that works best for older people.  A quick look at some popular online patient portals (one from a university hospital) and decision tools for prescription drugs and health care providers – even those designed for older people – shows that Web designers and app developers have yet to comply.  Colors, contrast, fonts, language use and organization are generally inconsistent with these recommendations.  No doubt this is because the creative young techies behind such online tools and apps find it difficult to imagine the needs of an audience that differ so from their own.

This small pothole stands to grow:

  • The number of older people is increasing as baby boomers age.  Unfortunately, there is no reason to believe that the rate of change in this group’s cognition, vision, hearing and fine motor skills – all of which are necessary to use and benefit from online health services – will slow.
  • While the trend in Web use and proficiency among older people is rising as baby boomers come of age, unfortunately, it is unlikely that that their health literacy and numeracy – both critical for increased participation in health care – are simultaneously improving.
  • Smartphones are quickly becoming the dominant means of Web access for many people, including many who previously had none.  Unfortunately, those tiny bright screens may not be up to the task of accommodating the normal sensory and motor changes of aging, leaving older people with the alternative of cumbersome and expensive laptops and desktop computers.
  • Government incentives through the Affordable Care Act and American Recovery and Reinvestment Act are accelerating the implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) with patient portals through which essential access to scheduling, health records and secure contact with providers will take place.  Publicly and privately produced decision support tools that make it possible to choose among Medicare Part D plans, hospitals, health plans and providers are currently available mostly online.  Unfortunately, cost considerations will undoubtedly weaken the telephone customer service, provider presence and technical assistance that make it possible for many older people to use these services.

What about fixing the pothole?

I think we can agree that actively engaging in our health care is no longer just a nice thing we might do if we have a little extra time and good online access.  It is now necessary to participate knowledgeably if we are going to benefit fully from the health services available to us. This imperative will only become stronger with the implementation of new technologies intended to reduce the cost of health care by placing increased responsibility on individuals to perform administrative and health-related tasks exclusively online.

Those who are unable to participate in their care because of issues related to access, design, functionality and content of online resources will suffer. Of course it is not only aging boomers who stand to lose here: Chances are that many people who are already ill or frail or who lack functional health literacy will fall behind regardless of age.  But the potential size of the baby boomers’ particular pothole poses such a threat to progress toward efficient, effective health care that it may spark some much-needed poking from the government and greater responsiveness from the private sector to the needs of an aging population.

Pre-emptive filling of the pothole will require both, and if we are lucky, the pressure to make online health information and services accessible, understandable, inexpensive, and useful for older people will improve the ride for all of us.

Guest Blog: Mayo Finds Heart Patients Skip Meds Due to Costs; Self-rationing in Health Continues

Jane Sarasohn-Kahn
Monday, April 25th, 2011

Jane Sarasohn-Kahn is a health economist and management consultant that serves clients at the intersection of health and technology. Her clients include all stakeholders in health, including providers, payors and plans; companies in biopharma, medical devices, financial services, technology and consumer goods; non-profits and NGOs. Jane’s lens on health is best-defined by the World Health Organization: health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. She blogs on HEALTHPopuli.

If you are a person with heart disease and you have received treatment at the Mayo Clinic, you’re certainly a fortunate health citizen. The hospital was just ranked #2 best hospital in the U.S. by US News & World Report.

However, if that’s you and the costs of post-op treatment — namely prescription drugs — are out of your financial reach, then you might skip them; thus, undoing your top-notch acute care.

This scenario is discussed in the April 2011 issue of Mayo Clinic Proceedings, which describes a study by Mayo researchers among 209 patients with heart failure who were prescribed statins – three-quarters of whom were on Medicare which has the Part D program that covers outpatient prescription drugs.

One-half of these patients stopped taking the statins due to cost, they told the researchers. Furthermore, one-quarter of patients in the study said they had also skipped prescribed medicines in the past due to cost.

Health Populi’s Hot Points: Welcome to the world of self-rationing in health, where even the lucky health citizen receiving the best acute care money (and third-party health insurance) can buy doesn’t follow through with recommended self-care at home.

The phenomenon of self-rationing health care due to cost is a particularly American invention, as more health citizens are asked to pay more out-of-pocket in a culture of medical entitlement. As additional health care costs are levied onto health consumers in the form of co-pays, higher coinsurance, and greater premium sharing with employers, more consumers are opting out in a variety of ways: from not filling prescriptions and skipping doses to not following up receiving recommended diagnostic tests and other self-care regimens at home.

In the recession, this pattern of health behavior has been tracked by the Kaiser Family Foundation’s Health Tracking Poll, which in December 2010 found that over 1 in 2 U.S. adults did something to self-ration care due to costs.

The challenge of medication adherence is complicated and thorny: there are many reasons why people don’t fill or take prescribed medications, such as unpleasant side effects, inconvenience, and some peoples’ unwillingness to ingest pills by mouth who might prefer another method — say, via dermal patch, inhaler, or even via medication-enhanced food (think: early polio vaccines on sugar cubes).

But poor medication adherence due to cost is another matter. This is where value-based insurance design and creative nudging comes into play. The Mayo researchers point to “better communication” between doctors and patients as a solution to help guide patients to cheaper drugs and treatments. This is necessary, but not sufficient. When it comes to drugs like statins, which treat a condition that for many people is virtually invisible (or perceived to be so), the solution to medication adherence will require several tactics combined to crack this problem.