Archive for February, 2011

Guest Blog: Cancer Survivorship and Fear

Andrew Schorr
Monday, February 28th, 2011

Andrew Schorr is the founder and host of Patient Power ®, a website and radio program designed to connect people with news and experts on health. Want to know more about Andrew Schorr and Patient Power? Go to: www.patientpower.info or follow him on twitter.

I had breakfast this morning in Las Vegas with my friend, Dave Garcia. Dave is a pit boss on the graveyard shift at the Belagio Hotel where they made the modern day Ocean’s buddy movies.

Dave is also a 52-year-old chronic lymphocytic leukemia survivor. He reached out to me online and we have been friends since soon after his diagnosis in 2002.

Dave is a father of two young kids. He dreams of seeing them grow up. But, understandably, he worries. Some days more than others. Today was his day to see his oncologist and get the latest blood test results. Would his white blood count be in the normal range? If so, his third round of treatment was still working. If not, he might be headed to a stem cell transplant, short-term disability, and living in another city for weeks or months.

As you can imagine, Dave was on pins and needles today. He would be against more chemo as he worries about the toxic drugs killing cancer cells but weakening him in the long run. Dave admits his blood pressure goes up on these days.

Dave is not alone in his fear. For millions of cancer survivors, while each day is special, some days are anxiety producing. For me it’s when I have a strange ache or pain. I rarely tell Esther, but I worry. For almost everyone it’s on days when we are having a “checkup.” The worry is, is this the day another shoe will drop? Fortunately, that hasn’t come for me yet and I hope it never will.  I am happy to say Dave just texted me. His worry today was unfounded. The WBC was normal. He was given a pass at least for a few more months. We hope forever!

At another meeting today in Las Vegas there was a discussion about information for cancer patients. Nurses ticking off all sorts of facts and admonishments to patients. The nurses feel they are doing their job of education quite well. Some patients would say maybe not so well. How come? Fear. For us it is not clinical routine. It is our lives on the line at diagnosis or at a checkup. We often don’t hear so well in those moments. Dave may not have heard so well today. Only one word counted: “normal.”

A lot is said by clinical folks about patients not taking their medicines correctly. That will be especially critical as more cancer medicines become oral rather than infused. My advice to the communicators and educators is to acknowledge a patient/survivor’s fear. By understanding how treatment days, the diagnosis by itself, and checkups make us anxious you can understand a lot and communication can be more effective.

Congratulations to my friend Dave on a positive doctor visit. I look forward to rolling the dice with you for many years to come and the dice always coming up 7’s!

Wishing you and your family the best of health!

Andrew

Guest Blog: A Young Father and His Information

Bryan Vartabedian
Friday, February 25th, 2011

Bryan Vartabedian, M.D. is a pediatric gastroenterologist at Texas Children’s Hospital and an Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas. He writes and thinks on the convergence of social media and medicine on his blog, 33 Charts. Want to know more? Go to: www.33charts.com  or subscribe to the RSS Feed.

It was sometime in the mid-nineties that parents started showing up in my office with reams of paper.  Inkjet printouts of independently unearthed information pulled from AltaVista and Excite.  Google didn’t exist.  In the earliest days of the web, information was occasionally leveraged by families as a type of newfound control.

A young father and his inkjet printer

One case sticks clearly in my mind.  It was that of a toddler with medically unresponsive acid reflux and chronic lung disease.  After following the child for some time, the discussion with the family finally moved to the option of a fundoplication (anti-reflux surgery).  On a follow-up visit the father had done his diligence and appeared in the office with a banker box brimming with printed information.  He had done his homework and his volume of paper was a credible show of force.

At the time in Houston the Nissen and Thal fundoplication were the accepted fundoplication procedures in children.  Deep from the bottom of one of the boxes the father produced a freshly reported method of fundoplication from Germany.  He had compared the potential complications with other types of fundoplication and this was the procedure he wanted.

What he didn’t understand was that an experimental technique used on a limited numbers of adults didn’t necessarily represent the best option for his toddler.  I gave it everything I had but didn’t get very far.  The tenor of his argument was slightly antagonistic.  Ultimately there was nothing more I could do.  I deferred the remainder of the discussion to one of our best ‘talking’ surgeons but knew the father wouldn’t get the time and consideration that I had offered.

I never saw the child again.  As they say, the father voted with his feet.

Information is the new third party in the exam room

I recall this so vividly because it was the first time that a parent insisted that their own information should supercede better clinical judgment and the clear individual needs of a child.  In hindsight, I believe, there was more to the encounter than a dialog surrounding a procedure.  This visit was about a young father’s newfound capacity to defy a system that for years has marginalized patients.

This was the first of many encounters involving a theme that has come to define my work with patients:  the contrast between information and good information.  Information is the new third party in the exam room.

Since the mid-nineties I have worked with thousands of empowered young families.  Any success that I’ve enjoyed stems from respect of the relationship that my patients have with their information.  Despite the rare case where the encounter is seen as a struggle of perceived control, my vantage point of the patient’s evolving relationship with information has been remarkable.

Sometimes I feel like a witness to history.

Guest Blog: I’m Dying To Know

Amy Berman
Thursday, February 24th, 2011

Amy Berman is a Program Officer for the John A. Hartford Foundation. She heads the Foundation’s Integrating and Improving Services portfolio, focusing on the development and dissemination of innovative, cost-effective models of care that improve health outcomes for older adults. More of  Amy Berman’s posts can be found/followed on the Hartford health AGEnda blog

In some ways, I consider myself lucky. I know this is a strange comment from someone diagnosed with Stage IV breast cancer. I say this, though, because the first steps on my journey with end-stage cancer were undertaken with the help of a team of health care professionals who excelled not only in medicine, but also in communication.|

Communication in health care is often overlooked. Data on doctor-patient communication is rarely collected, and there are few measures of success. Yet, I believe good communication—both between members of the health care team and between providers and patients—is essential for good treatment.

With one glaring exception, which I wrote about in January, I was blessed with proactive doctors from the day I walked into my primary care physician’s office, certain of my diagnosis. Dr. Lelchuk immediately knew I needed imaging tests and a biopsy of the suspicious area.  She went above and beyond by personally getting on the phone with a trusted oncology surgeon to set up an immediate appointment.

The waiting room at the cancer center was comfortable. We sat there, perhaps six women, all dressed in white cotton robes as if we were at a spa awaiting our manicures and pedicures. Some women, probably there for an annual mammogram, seemed relaxed and even chatted. One was there for follow-up to make sure that cancer had not recurred. And a few sat quietly, nervous. Like me, they were waiting to find out if they had cancer. Unlike me, they had no idea what to expect.

 

One by one, they called women in for their mammograms.  Some were called back again for additional imaging. Shortly after my turn the office seemed to jump into hyperdrive. Senior doctors and young fellows converged in a room where they looked at the images.  We women sat just outside that room as they spoke in low and urgent voices, trying to make out their garbled sentences. The waiting room had mostly cleared out at this point. I was sitting next to an elegant-looking African American woman in pearls.  She looked as if she was about to throw up. The obvious urgency in the office terrified her.

Her anxiety made me think about how much we fear the unknown. It’s human nature. Once we understand something—even if we don’t like it—we can begin to accept it. That is why I believe one of the most important duties of health care professionals is to communicate fully with their patients, to explain their condition and treatment options in ways they can understand.

I turned to the woman. “Don’t worry,” I said. “It’s not you.  It’s me.” Her eyes widened as she looked over at me. I wasn’t sure she believed me so I got up and walked into the radiology room, interrupting the conferring doctors.

behold-the-enemy“Those are my images, aren’t they?” I asked the radiologist in earshot of my spa-mate.  I suspect that most doctors would have politely but firmly asked me to return to the waiting area.

The radiologist‘s response was remarkable.  “Would you like to meet your enemy?” she asked.

Tightening the belt of my robe I said, “Yes!”

Dr. Danon asked everyone else to leave and invited me in.  She began explaining the complicated topography of my images.  I felt empowered and smiled through a stream of tears.  Now I knew my enemy.  I was the last patient to be seen that day.  The kindness of the radiologist stayed with me that night.

The next morning I returned for a biopsy.  The same radiologist explained every step of the process.  She knew I was comforted by knowing.  She even turned the sonogram screen toward me so together we could watch as she removed samples of each suspicious area.  Mesmerized, I didn’t even notice any pain from the procedure.

I watched as the radiologist filled tubes with pieces of my breast. She pointed out that the tissue showed extensive blood vessel formation, a hallmark of cancer.  Dr. Danon generously shared information with me every step of the way but—more than that—she prepared me for the biopsy results.

Next came my first meeting with the oncologist.  The biopsy confirmed what had been suspected.  Knowing what to expect, even though it was devastating, braced me for what felt like my own head-on collision.  Dr. Burdette-Radoux sat down with me and explained the treatment options for inflammatory breast cancer and took communication one step further. Unlike the physician I visited for a second opinion, my oncologist was eager to discuss my goals.

“We’re going to send you for a bone scan to determine if the cancer has spread,” she explained in a soothing voice.  Then she discussed the differences between the treatment options depending on the results.  Her kind and careful explanation armed me for two different battle scenarios.   The scan showed a “hot spot” and days later a small piece of bone was removed from my lower spine for biopsy.  Each step of the way I knew my enemy, and thanks to Dr. Burdette-Radoux, I wasn’t caught off guard later that week when the metastasis was confirmed.

At the Maimonides Cancer Center—where I chose to go for diagnosis and treatment—the quality of the communication was exquisite. I wish all adults diagnosed with a serious illness could have a similar experience. Unfortunately, I think my experience is the exception, rather than the rule.

Older adults, in particular, often struggle to get good information from their doctors. They may find the medical terminology off-putting.  They may suffer from impediments like vision or hearing loss that the clinician fails to factor into his or her approach. And sadly, some providers withhold information from older adults out of some archaic and ageist notion that they can’t handle the truth.

In reality, most people go to the doctor because they already know something is wrong.  Like the woman who sat next to me awaiting her mammogram results, not knowing can be more terrifying than the diagnosis itself.  No matter our age, we have a fundamental right to know the details of our own condition, if we so choose.  I understand that not everyone might want to receive all the information up front, as I did.  But ultimately, people need to be informed in order to take responsibility for their health.  How, then, can we train physicians and other health professionals to become better communicators during serious illness?

Recently, the American Society of Clinical Oncology released recommendations to improve doctor-patient communications about “the full range of palliative care and treatment options for patients diagnosed with advanced cancer (defined as incurable disease).”  Perhaps soon, patients and families experiencing serious illness will be able to meet their enemy just as I met mine.

Second in a series. See also: “Can Good Care Produce Bad Health?”

Guest Blog: A Disconnect in Consumer Reports Survey of Doctors and Patients

Gary Schwitzer
Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011

Gary SchwitzerGary Schwitzer, has spent more than 30 years in journalism on radio, television, interactive multimedia and the Internet. He is the publisher of HealthNewsReview.org, a website aimed at improving the accuracy, balance and completeness of health news reporting and helping consumers evaluate the evidence for and against new ideas in health care. Gary blogs on the HealthNewsReview.org website. Want to know more? Go to: www.healthnewsreview.org or subscribe to the RSS Feed.

The thing that jumped out at me most from the Consumer Reports survey of almost 700 primary care physicians and thousands of CR subscribers – described by CR as “What doctors wish their patients knew” – was something about what patients wish their doctors knew. From the CR summary:

“The medical profession has not always been the most transparent. The American Medical Association, for example, has fought to keep the Medicare payment records of individual doctors confidential. Here are a couple of things that primary-care doctors might not want to tell you:

* They talk to drug companies more than you might realize. The majority of doctors we surveyed said that pharmaceutical company representatives contacted them more than 10 times a month. Thirty-six percent were contacted more than 20 times a month. On average doctors said they spend a few hours a week dealing with pharmaceutical salespeople.

Our patient survey suggests that’s a possible point of friction. Patients were less satisfied when they thought their doctors relied too much on prescription drugs and were unwilling to consider nontraditional or nondrug treatments. More than one-quarter of patients indicated some level of discomfort with their doctors’ inclination to prescribe drugs. If you are concerned about your doctor’s relationship with pharmaceutical companies, don’t hesitate to bring up the subject at your next visit.

* Doctors are dubious about patients’ need to know about malpractice claims or professional disciplinary actions. Forty-seven percent said information about whether the physician has been involved in a malpractice lawsuit was “of little value.” Only 17 percent said that information about disciplinary actions by medical licensing boards was “very valuable.”

Wow, that feels like a disconnect!