Archive for May, 2010

Will You Be Helped by the New High-Risk Health Pools?

Trudy Lieberman
Wednesday, May 26th, 2010

The new health reform law is what I like to call an “over-the-line proposition” because undoubtedly, someone is going to be left out.  What passed the Congress will not bring universal health coverage to America; nor does it assure that everyone is entitled to health care as a matter of right.  It simply adds more people to the current system by giving them subsidies to buy insurance they couldn’t otherwise afford.  In such a system, there will always be people over the line—they won’t qualify for this subsidy or that program either because the government limits its spending on them, or it wants to encourage people to use private insurance to keep those markets strong.

Which brings me to the problem of the new high-risk pools states are supposed to set up to help really sick people who have no options before the law becomes fully effective in 2014. Think of it like your state’s high-risk pool for bad drivers.  Thirty-five states already offer high-risk pools where the coverage may cost twice as much as a policy in the private market available to people who are not sick.  The new pools will operate side-by-side pools already existing but with the government throwing in $5 billion spread around to all the states. The idea is that the extra government funds will make the premiums cheaper in the newer pools.

So here’s the “over-the-line” problem.  The $5 billion is not enough to cover all those needing help, and states are likely to let some join the pools and not others by imposing eligibility requirements.  Will people have to be citizens?  How long must you have had a preexisting condition?  Will the application process be designed to discourage people from applying?  (We know other government programs do that.)

Here’s another catch:  To qualify for the new risk pool coverage, you cannot have had other health insurance for the previous six months.  What an irony!  The very people who are really in need of coverage are disqualified if, for example, they already have coverage even if it is so pricey they can barely afford it.  If you currently get coverage in your state’s older high-risk pool with its sky-high premiums, you’re out of luck and can’t switch to what may be cheaper coverage.  In Texas, for instance, premiums in the new risk pool will cost about half as much as the state’s older risk pool.  So much for comparison shopping!

Then, too, people will be over-the-line if they can’t even afford the premiums even in the new pool.  An older person applying for coverage in one of the new pools will pay four times more than a younger person.  And their out-of-pocket costs will be limited to about $6000 ($12,000 for a family).   Those costs still may be burdensome.  “The unintended consequence of this legislation is we’re going to effectively penalize the people who have been doing the sacrificing all along,” says Oklahoma insurance commissioner Kim Holland.

Still, if you think you qualify for coverage which begins July 1 – and can afford it – check out these websites for more information:  www.naschip.org/states_pools.htm and www.hhs.gov/ociio .  One more thing.  Prepared Patient Forum would like you to be our eyes and ears as these new and somewhat controversial risk pools head toward implementation.  Since there are going to be huge differences among states, we’d like you to tell us what requirements your states are imposing and tell us how much the coverage will cost.  How is this affecting your family budget?  What services are covered and which ones excluded?  We look forward to your comments.

Participate in My Care? Room for Improvement

Jessie Gruman
Thursday, May 20th, 2010

The Center for Advancing Health, which I direct, just released “A Snapshot of People’s Engagement in Their Health Care,” a study that found that most of us do relatively little to participate in our health care.

To assess our current level of engagement in care, CFAH searched 31 national surveys sponsored by the government, foundations and private organizations to locate data on the specific behaviors that each of us must do in order to effectively participate in our care.  For example, I have to make sure that my medical information is conveyed to my various doctors and institutions.  I have to ask questions of my doctor when the next steps I have to take are not clear. And I have to talk about recommended tests and treatments with my doctor to make the right choice for me.

For the vast majority of engagement behaviors like this for which data were found, about one-third of us do them regularly, about one-third of us do them occasionally and one-third of us don’t do them at all.

While the lack of resources, insurance coverage, low literacy levels and illness present real barriers to participation for some us, lack of engagement is far too common among those who face none of them.

Recently passed health care reform promises to increase our access to care, but without our active, knowledgeable participation – from both those of us who are currently insured or newly insured – that reform will yield only sporadic improvements.

While each of us – along with our caregivers and loved ones – must take on these responsibilities if we are to benefit optimally from our health care, we cannot do so without the cooperation of every stakeholder in the health care enterprise.

Take a look at the report and comment here.

Our Shopping Problem

Jessie Gruman
Monday, May 17th, 2010

Apparently, borrowers who obtained a home loan in the last five years spent five hours researching a mortgage, half the amount of time they spent researching a car and the same amount of time they spent researching a vacation, according to a study reported in The New York Times on Saturday.

Given the number of folks that signed up for all those risky home financing options – and according to the survey sponsors, this is apparently not enough time for people to go through the steps necessary to make sure they are getting the best mortgage.

Contrast this with the fact that only 5-10 percent of us have even considered using objective information to make sure we are choosing the best doctor or hospital or health plan, if we have a choice among them.

It is as though the “shopping” is a process that we simply don’t apply to our decisions about health care providers.  Part of the problem is, of course, that despite consistent media coverage, only about one-third of us understand that the quality of health care varies widely.  And then there is that pesky problem of the lack of relevant and accessible comparable information on any of these topics, especially on physicians, meaning that if we want to do the research, trustworthy information often simply doesn’t exist.  But even so, we tend to trust word-of-mouth recommendations over available objective information.

I was especially bemused by one of the comments in response to the Times blog: “Why is this a surprise to anyone? You USE a car. You USE a house. That’s what you spend the time shopping for. You don’t USE a mortgage. The mortgage or the car financing is just the means to get it. You can’t put the top down on the mortgage and drive it around.”

We USE health care.  But it seems that many of us have yet to approach obtaining it with the careful, critical eye we use to get the best deal on a trip to Disney World.

Access to Health Insurance Is Just a Start…

Kalahn Taylor-Clark
Friday, May 7th, 2010

In May 2009, my 61 year old mother, who lives in Maine, was diagnosed with Stage 3 Breast Cancer.  My proud mother worked hard every day of her life as a cleaning person to provide me the best education, often bartering with clients so that she could provide dental or eye care or other services for me while I was growing up.

But these days I have full health care coverage through my think tank job in DC, and my mother remains uninsured…as she has been almost her entire life.  When I asked her why she had waited so long to get a mammography, she said that the ‘free’ clinic wasn’t really free, and that she simply couldn’t afford it.  When I asked her why she didn’t ask me for the funds, she said that it wasn’t my job to take care of her… 

So, how does someone like my mother, who insists on standing on her own two feet without help from others, navigate a health care system that simply seems to work against her?  It is my sincere hope that as health care reform changes roll out, we create more health and health care information that is easy to understand and accessible for people of all backgrounds.  Transparent information about cost, quality, and available support will be needed even more as more people enter the health care system.  All of us will have to make numerous decisions about the choices that we have for insurance coverage, and particularly what those choices will mean with regard to cost, treatment decisions and finding safe, decent care.  

Several organizations have supported efforts to enhance communication and care quality broadly and in vulnerable communities, such as the Consumer Health Foundation, which provides grants to communities who are trying to enhance care quality for individuals.   I believe that with support for and from many grassroots and local organizations, more people like my Mom, will get the information and personal guidance and assistance that they need to make informed choices about their coverage and care.